Nternational Experiences In Selecting Members Of Constitutional Courts

An original constitutional study supported by the experiences of the constitutional courts in the world

We have already said that the international experience confirms thconsti constitutional courts often consist of multiple categories, and that the number of judges in them usually represents the minority, not the majority, unlike what is marketed in Iraq by some personalities and parties who are not familiar with the local constitutional contents and the international experiences, among whom who talk aimlessly.  The origin of the preponderant theory in this regard – according to the experiences of the international constitutional courts, the most important of which will be presented – is the inclusion of other groups in the court, other than judges, Who have the majority and the probability in many experiences.  And you will notice through the presentation that the predominance in these courts usually rests with the jurists and not the judges.  In fact, there are international constitutional courts that do not have a single judge.  The groups that make up the court may be represented by law professors in universities, lawyers, former presidents of the republic, some administrative officials or some public figures, and so on.